|
Subject: |
See also
Other Correspondence
FOCAS questions |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:33:33 +0000 |
|
From: |
Joseph Villarosa <alphanalyst@catskill.net> |
Dear FOCAS
I’m on your website now and would like to potentially donate funds
BUT I’ve been burned in the past
So I have a few questions PLEASE, before I donate
Keep scrolling down for two images
See two images below
I’m ready to donate, but I need to ensure all is legit
Thanks
PS: Your website needs to have an email address
|
Subject: |
Re: FOCAS questions |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:58:52 -0500 |
|
To: |
Joseph Villarosa <alphanalyst@catskill.net> |
I have
talked to the Charitable solicitations department.
The statute clearly says that we are exempt. Their interpretation is that
we should file with them so that they can certify that we are exempt and they
have just sent out a letter asking us to file. They are aware that
thousands of groups in NC with minimal income do not file and there is no
penalty for failure to file if the organizations income is less that $5,000
We have NEVER had income of $5000 in a year and
will not this year unless you give us over $2500. In that case we will
have to file next year,paying
a fee based on THIS year's income as stated in the statute. You can
verify this by calling the charitable solicitations office
The money for the Robeson suit was set aside and ALL
money collected was used for that purpose. The collection of this money
falls within the FOCAS charter and under Federal law is tax deductible.
No one was "duped" and if you say that, it is slander.
I presume that you have misstated your intention in your original letter and
have some connection with the lawsuit; never the
less, we would be delighted to receive your contribution. We will
file with CSL at the end of the year and expect to be certified as exempt
again.
I am interested to know what your connection is with the Robeson law
suit. We believe that we have done a great public service in aiding the
lawsuit and I hope that you agree.
Elliot
On 11/20/10 5:10 PM, "Joseph Villarosa" <alphanalyst@catskill.net> wrote:
Dear Friends at UNC
I believe the attached complaint against Dr. Cramer is very clear.
Please review.
Thank you
- joseph villarosa
From: Joseph Villarosa
<alphanalyst@catskill.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:53:24 -0500
To: <chancellor@unc.edu>,
pneville@email.unc.edu>,
<dlysle@email.unc.edu>,
<wblair@unc.edu>
Conversation: Complaint against Professor Elliot Cramer
Subject: Re: Complaint against Professor Elliot Cramer
This is my second email
See the NEW email from Professor Cramer
Attached as a PDF
This man is clinically deranged and a VERY poor UNC representative!!!
Note his language!
May I suggest you get your pit bull to back off
Or I will take legal action
I DEMAND an apology
NOT from UNC
But from the Professor
Thank you!
From:
Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 6:05:12 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: FW: Complaint
against Professor Elliot Cramer
Attachments: Cramer rude email.pdf; Professor Elliot Cramer v1.pdf
Attorney Leslie Strohm
I intentionally left your office out of the loop in my prior communiqués
But after getting the last email from Professor Cramer, I now feel this is a
potential legal matter
Kindly review the attached
Then discuss with your aforementioned colleagues
I’m hoping someone from UNC will contact me on Monday
I’m also hoping UNC will officially speak with the Professor before then
Thank you
- joseph
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 5:51:51 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Complaint
against Professor Elliot Cramer
Attachments: Professor Elliot Cramer v1.pdf; Villarosa
to UNC Legal.pdf
Dear Colleagues
Please see another document on the good Professor...
Thanks
From:
Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 6:30:23 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Complaint
against Professor Elliot Cramer
Thank you counselor!
Please review the policies I cited in my first letter.
I have a LIST of well over a dozen breached internal policies.
In addition there were other legal lines he overstepped (think NCSOS).
SOME of which were listed said note.
As well, I just spoon-fed you very clear examples in a second letter.
Should you need full original emails I can send digitally.
FYI, I heard today, from a reliable source, that Cramer contacted Barrett.
The plaintiff in the Robeson lawsuit, which Cramer’s chipin supported via Attorney Gerber.
I also know Gerber called Barrett about this matter.
My point?
ALL THREE violated NCSOS laws, and I feel Cramer is now instigating trouble
against ME.
Rather ironic as I violated no law or guideline.
Why?
B/c I pointed out his MANY infractions.
I’d therefore appreciate your office enforcing my C&D request by
speaking directly to him.
I’m here to help.
I have an attorney involved on my end.
But I remain, pro per/se.
Thanks kindly
- joseph
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 3:04:19 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Complaint
against Professor Elliot Cramer
Dear Chancellor and Vice
Chancellor
Thanks for looking into the matter with Dr. Cramer
Please note - I just “pinged” his two UNC email addresses
To see if they were valid
(A techie test, NOT via an actual email)
BOTH came back with a very high probability the accounts are STILL active /
working
I’m shocked
See below
No one is telling you how to run your battleship
BUT, this Professor is besmirching your good name on many levels
And totally harassed me
AND broke the law!
As such, I was hoping for:
I’m hoping you will be so good
as to provide same
He’s obviously been a thorn in your side for some time now
In my mind, neither his age nor his “emeritus” status have NOTHING
to do with sanctioning him
I trust you agree
What’s right is right
FYI, I also heard he tried stirring the pot and contracted SEVERAL others about
me
Including Attorney Gerber who benefited from his ILLEGAL chipin
This does not make me happy
i.e., He’s pretending to play nice in your eyes, but still harassing me!
Note — I’ve already spoken to the NCSOS
A FEW times
And I have written confirmation that his fundraising violated many state
guidelines
EACH of which is punishable by a $10,000 fine
Doubt, me, see the SOS website for the guidelines, they are very clear
Because he co-branded the chipins with the
“UNC” email account
I’m entitled to ALSO report UNC to the SOS
I really don’t want to do this
But I will unless I get confirmation that he has been disciplined
He wronged me and I don’t want this swept under the carpet
As I said before, I’m on your side here and look forward to your timely
reply
- jpv
_____________________________________________________________
From:
Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:57:53 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Complaint
against Professor Elliot Cramer
Greetings UNC friends
I was hoping for a reply to my below email
Last time I checked -- Cramer still was sending emails via his UNC addy
I find this odd considering the situation
See two bullet points below
Regards,
- joseph
________________________________________________________________________________
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:34:38 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Complaint
against Professor Elliot Cramer
Thanks counselor
A comment or two please
FYI, in today’s age, it takes seconds/moments to disable two UNC email
accounts used by Cramer
Just ping your techie and they will do it in a NY second
Then let the kind professor do HIS business on a public email agent like the
rest of us
In my mind, Cramer is intentionally comingling your (UNC’s) good name
with his private interests (FOCAS 501c3)
He is using UNC as a “lure” to privately raise money for his
charity and for “tax deductible” lawsuit donations
(Tax deductible lawsuit? Jeez)
Shame on him
This is plain per my documentation
I’m merely pointing this out by providing hard evidence of his errs
I trust you agree
I will back off
But I was hoping for HIS apology and some confirmation he was disciplined
FYI, I WILL pursue a complaint with the NCSOS
NOT again UNC, but against Cramer, personally
And against FOCAS
The SOS has already - voluntarily - begun an investigation
I have written confirmation on this
Warm regards,
- joseph
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 1:15:46 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: haven't heard
from them
Attorney / Vice Chancellor Storm
and Chancellor Thorp (et al)
I’m NOT pleased
I’ve received yet ANOTHER disturbing email from Professor Cramer
EVEN AFTER I’ve now asked UNC SEVERAL TIMES to speak to him
and remove his UNC email address
See his email to me below in bold and large font
See also the title of his email to me above “Haven’t heard from
them”
Below as well, are your emails to me assuring me you will look into the matter
with Dr. Cramer
(He doubts we ever corresponded which signifies UNC has NOT contacted him as I
requested!
This is Unacceptable)
As you may recall, I predicted he would continue to harass me unless you
removed his UNC email address
I was correct
I received the below email only minutes ago
Note where he doubts we ever corresponded
AND he AGAIN touts me VIA YOUR UNC EMAIL address
I must now insist that UNC strip him of ALL UNC email addresses
As he is using YOUR EMAIL address NOT ONLY for illegal fund raising
WITHOUT a license
Please see the email below from the Secretary of state CONFIRMING I am correct!
BUT, to slander and harass others
Per the wonderful press I’ve read about him, at
least he didn’t threaten me with a gun
As he did others!
The fact that I requested UNC to police your professor repeatedly -
And you did not, now
makes UNC liable for HIS harassment
I have thus far
been cordial & respectful to UNC, but enough is enough
You have clearly not followed up as indicated below by Cramer
I hope I’m being clear
I will await your written confirmation that you:
You do understand, HIS UNC
“branded” emails make UNC legally liable?
As such I am now asking UNC to ensure he ceases and desists from further
contact
See below emails from
you assuring me you would look into this matter
- joseph villarosa
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 5:28:18 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Hello Joe
(Attorney Thompson: I am bcc’ing you on this so we may again discuss Professor
Cramer)
Attorney / Vice Chancellor Storm and Chancellor Thorp (et al)
See below for YET ANOTHER email from Cramer
Sent after YET ANOTHER Cease and Desist
Note how he continuous touts me:
Note, every
email to him and to UNC has been legally traced
As such, I can see EVERY forward, every read, every “touch” of my
emails
See below were you will note that again, Cramer is a liar
He claims all of my emails are automatically placed in the trash
When in reality, he reads them ten or more times
AND has even forwarded them to others without my knowledge
Which is hypocritical as his email stated “the courteous thing to do is
to Cc or don't you know how”
I.e., He SECRETLY copied others on my email without my knowledge
While I OPENLY did so on my last and this
See below where Cramer forwarded my email TWO TIMES to someone
Again, kindly have your Professor cease and desist from all emails of ANY
nature
I do NOT want to hear from him again
Scroll down for some three goodies
_____________________________________________________________________________________
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 7:13:29 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers; Nicole Thompson
Subject: Re: Hello Joe
Attorney Strohm
Thanks
This is a no brainer
He is breaching your personal use policy
I’ve read it
He is also breaching your code of conduct policies
I’ve read them as well
See my first email to you with other violations
I listed them precisely
May I suggest you immediately “freeze” ALL of his UNC email
accounts
This will buy you time to investigate the situation more fully
FYI, I’ve already contacted my attorney who is copied on this email
I’m really hoping we do not have to send you/UNC a cease and desist for
Cramer
A waste of my time, counsels and yours...
Just email your tech folks and “freeze” his email accounts
Then force him to use a public email agent until you are comfortable deleting
his accounts
I’m a nice guy, but he is harassing me
This is plain as day
In the process, he’s leaving a “UNC digital fingerprint” on
every email
In today’s age, all it takes is ONE email from you to:
And
this is over
I trust you agree this is the prudent approach
As he is opening - far and wide – a door of liability
And as I told you before
I have no beef with UNC
But he is your “agent” as evidenced by his UNC email address
I therefore hope someone contacts him and your IT staff
- joseph
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 8:13:43 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Hello Joe
Attorney Strohm
Your recent email and my reply are below
AS WELL as YET ANOTHER caustic email from Cramer
The THIRD today alone
Some highlights – all direct quotes:
Note his last
comment, that is a direct threat
See his exact email below the screen images I provided
Allow me to be blunt: Cramer is slandering me under your University email
address
This means UNC is slandering me
I have now asked several times --
Kindly freeze his email addresses until you have completed your
investigation
If I receive one more email from him and I will go directly to the press and
share all
I’ve since identified over a dozen journalists direct email addresses
that have written on Cramer
I’m SURE they would LOVE a follow-up article on his “Colt 45”
comment
Judging from the below, I’m guessing you don’t need any
additional press on your profs...
See this:
Again, I will await
confirmation your office has sanctioned Professor Cramer
See 4 articles below
It seems like UNC has had negative press from White Supremacists (Cramer) to
public masturbators (Tilson)
I wish I were making this up, but I’m not...
Do you really need more bad press?
Now please do your job
Thank you
- joseph
____________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 11:25:21 AM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Professor Cramer --
Re: Hello Joe
Attachments: Professor Elliot Cramer v1.pdf
Attorney Strohm
FYI, Cramer sent a 4th email yesterday
See below that I’m providing for your legal files
As well, note the highlighted areas
Then you will see how Cramer’s PERSONAL comments are comingled with UNC
branding
A clear conflict of interest
I also direct you to my original communiqué dated 20 November
As your prior email indicted you needed to research the violations
I already did that on November 20 and provided these to you in writing
Therein you will find the precise links to the exact UNC breached guidelines
Finally, please see the UNC policies in the below screenshot
Hint: Black arrow = violations by Cramer
Hint: See Person Use Policy screenshot
You may want to review my attached letter and the below
Regards
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:02:49 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Professor Cramer:
Cease and Desist Request
Attachments: Professor Elliot Cramer.pdf
Attorney Thompson
Per our earlier emails, attached and below (URL) please find a document
highlighting Professor Cramer’s missives
His words are in read
They are then highlighted in yellow and green
My documentation is VERY VERY clear
Hopefully this link will work as well, same documentation, PRIVATE URL
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44918515/Professor-Elliot-Cramer?secret_password=9mv6e3a9gmoqy38nh69
(If not, see attached)
In brief, kindly send your cease and desist request to:
Kindly cc. our friends at UNC so they may reinforce the C&D
Please note -
he is now using a Bell South email address
And he has recently contacted my ISP!!! (see last email in documentation)
He has also threatened to slander me online
In doing so, he has breached multiple UNC polices:
Part
of this is THEIR problem
But when it comes to slandering my name and harassing me, that is a different
story
Kindly review my VERY clear documentation
I believe at this point, an email notice will suffice
(See below)
Thank you,
- joseph
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:46:06 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Villarosa
Cease and Desist to Cramer
Dear UNC
I’m sending the below email from Attorney Thompson via sophisticated and
legal tracking email
This way, I know every single time it is “touched” (opened,
forwarded, read – and to whom and for how long)
I am letting you know this because I feel UNC is liable if Cramer continues
EVEN IF THE EMAILS COME FROM HIS BELLSOUTH EMAIL ADDRESS
I’m hoping my attorney’s letter will be taken seriously
I certainly know I’m not joking
As a clear example, please see Professor Cramer’s own words below
ALL of them are here with pretty colors and highlights
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44918515/Professor-Elliot-Cramer?secret_password=9mv6e3a9gmoqy38nh69
For now, this link is private
I’d hate to have to make him any more famous than he already is...
See also the precise policies he violated below
I trust you can figure out the rest
Regards,
From:
Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:40:19 AM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Professor Elliot
Cramer: BREACH of Cease and Desist Request
Attachments: Professor Elliot Cramer v1 to UNC.pdf; Professor Elliot
Cramer v2.pdf; 2010-12-08_2309 cramer is isn't
employee.png
Attorney Strohm
and Chancellor Holden
Please see the attached document which is updated with the latest and greatest
Cramer missives
Some are so outrageous, they are almost comedic
Apparently you didn’t speak to him
Or if you did, he now believes he can commit errs under your email address
THEN switch to a BellSouth address and begin again with a clean slate
Life (and law) don’t work that way
Also note that not only did he violated cease and desists from me
BUT see as well, the several emails he provided AFTER my attorney formally
request he cease communication
NOT only has he continued, post facto --
But he has OPENLY slandered me and OPENLY professed he will do so publicly
I’m asking you again to speak to him
Please note he has also “switched hit” several times
When it conveniences him, he boasts about being a faculty member
Then at other times he claims NO relationship to UNC
YET he does so while using an ACTIVE UNC email address which you have still not
disabled
See below and attached screenshot
Note where he also said I was harassing UNC
(I’m trying to HELP UNC!!!)
Need I remind you that ALL of this is related to his illegal fundraising for
FOCAS
Which he did via a UNC email address
See below screenshot DIRECTLY from the NC Secretary of State
It PROVES I am correct
Lastly, I am copying Robert A. Marotto, who is the
Animal Services Director of Orange County
http://www.co.orange.nc.us/AnimalServices/admin.asp
Unless I’m mistaken, Cramer’s FOCAS has been illegally raising
money for Mr. Marotto’s shelter
I’m guessing he may like to know about this situation so he could ensure
funds are legally raised
Please scroll to see screenshots and see attached
- jpv
Note: Maratto
consulted the Orange County Attorney and just ignored the jerk since everything
he says is false.
FOCAS still LEGALLY raises money to help
the County shelter. Charitable
Solicitations ALSO ignores the jerk as does UNC.
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 9:45:02 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Just couldn't
keep your mouth shut, could you
Have fun professor
Just remember, I can make you VERY famous as well
Remember this?
http://www.scribd.com/full/44918515?access_key=key-1fi1ux4rcl85dozhbitk
I see TEN read of this thus far on a PRIVATE thread
Care to see 10,000 on a public thread?
So, you can track my software?
Ha!
I can change my IP address and send my emails from Russia if I wish
Can you?
Your computer skills are like 25 years old
I know, I’ve read your OLD research
Ha ha
I knew that stuff in third grade
OK Professor
PLEASE PROVE ME WRONG
PLEASE show me a VALID NC STATE solicitation license for your Gerber Chipin
PLEASE...I’m waiting
NOT reference to an OLD exemption for 2006
BUT A CURRENT LICENSE!
And when you are at it I DARE YOU
PROVE that Bella was
Go
ahead, I DARE YOU
And I DARE NCRR
Please show me ONE lick of evidence
Now, care to see whose computer skills are better?
Ha ha!
Apparently you questioned me invading your privacy in your last email
NOW you have tracking software
Isn’t that a TAD hypocritical?
From:
Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 11:48:20 AM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Professor Cramer
Created a Villarosa Website -- Re: As promised
Attachments: 2010-12-12_1101.png; 2010-12-12_1102 PAWS.png;
2010-12-12_1119 APS critic.png
Dear UNC Chancellors & Attorney Thompson
Please see below and click the link in Cramer's email
Note - he created a website JUST to bash me
Also note, this DOES DIRECTLY involves UNC STILL
Scroll down and see that the email he uses for the website
It is a UNC EMAIL address!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
One of SEVERAL UNC emails he uses DIRECTLY linked to UNC networks
I wish I were making this up
This also involves UNC as he is clearly breaching your retaliation policy!
Why is he retaliating?
Cake
I discovered FOCAS did NOT have a solicitation license
He then lied to me to cover his tracks
I didn't buy it and have confirmation from the NCSOS of his falsehoods
Also - he was an open critic of APS who LOST their solicitation license
See below news article
NOW if it becomes public that his rescue group/FOCAS lost their
He will be embarrassed
See below for PROOF
So far, you have done NOTHING to police Cramer
And I have clearly tried to work with UNC
I now feel you need to contact me directly as he has gone too far
I also feel UNC should take action to remove the below website
AND remove ALL of his access to your networks
(Email addresses, etc.)
He is DIRECTLY leaving UNC's digital fingerprint on ALL of his handiwork
He was also provided a formal cease and desist by Attorney Thompson
He not only breached it -- but he went so far as to now create a WEBSITE on me!
Sadly, see below, HE PULLED IN UNC
How?
See his email address below from ourpaws
A website he advertising on YOUR UNC website!
I've told you before, I hold no malice against UNC
But enough is enough
I'm therefore requesting WE set up a con-call
I will leave this up to you
Kindly provide a time/date on MONDAY
This has to stop
Cramer is absolutely out of control and not only slandering me
BUT - he is squarely placing UNC in a legally liable position
- joseph
______________________________________________________
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 3:41:45 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Fwd: Re: Professor
Cramer -- Fwd: As promised
Attachments: Professor Elliot Cramer v2.pdf; Professor Elliot Cramer v1
to UNC.pdf
Friends at UNC and Attorney Thompson
Kindly scroll all of the way down this email to see certain documentation
Enough is enough
I'm hoping we may set up a con-call ASAP to address this matter
I have already contacted his ISP
I have already had my attorney ask him SEVERAL TIMES to C&D
I'm soon to contact campus police and NC authorities
http://www.dps.unc.edu/Police/policenav.cfm
This has gone too too far
And along the way, Cramer has left precise UNC digital fingerprints
Need I remind you, ALL of this, ALL of this, is because I caught him in an
illegal fund raising campaign via his focas@unc.edu
email account
See attached document for PROOF of this
Allow me to be clear -- Cramer ILLEGALLY raised funds for his nonprofit via UNC
linked paypal account!!!!!
i.e., He is clearly violating your retaliation policy along with personal use
policy and many other UNC violations
I cannot for the life of me understand why you have not taken shift and harsh
action
See my emails from a few WEEKS ago, where I predicted this would happen unless
UNC intervened
You have guidelines, I've read them
Why are you not following them?
Your avoidance on this matter, has - in Cramer's mind -- PERMITTED him to
overstep the line
It's time for UNC to act
I look forward to your reply
Please scroll ALL of the way down and also, humor me and see the attached
document
Then note your UNC email address on his many posts
- jpv
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 4:19:56 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Better not
antagonize her, Joe
Attachments: 2010-12-12_1425 Reitman.png; 2010-11-16_1145 FOCAS
NCSOS.png; 2010-12-12_1119 APS critic.png; 2010-12-12_1549 not on paws.png;
Professor Elliot Cramer v1 to UNC.pdf; Professor Elliot Cramer v2.pdf
Cramer (cc. To UNC Legal)
I find it comedic that you call me a "scumbag" -- you are a PhD and a
Professor
(Please scroll down to see your threat and your exact quote)
Obviously not in English
"Antagonize" Reitman?
I merely contacted her and told her HER/YOUR website is slandering my person
Which CLEARLY it is: http://www.ourpaws.info/joe
Her reply?
See below
She doesn't even know who your "ourpaws"
group is!!!!
Yet you list her as a Vice President and a Board Member!
Laughable
This means you have a fraudulent animal
rights group created with FAKE board members!
Think I'm lkidding?
Read HER OWN WORDS below
In fact, see below, she wrote you to tell you to remove her name from your
website!
Why?
She doesn't even know what the ourpaws group is!!!
And yet you list her as a VP WITHOUT her knowledge or permission!!
http://www.ourpaws.info/
So now you are using HER to threaten me?
I'm copying Ms. Reitman on this as I'm SURE she will
NOT be pleased YOU volunteered HER services
Please be advised that I also recently contacted the UNC Police
Just spoke to dispatcher "Vicky"
Doubt me?
Call them to verify if you wish...
I will be filing a complaint against you with the police
I'm tired of this
You've been asked to cease and desist and instead you slander my name and
breach my attorney's requests
I find it comedic that you are retaliating against me for pointing out your
ILLEGAL chipin through UNC
In the process you have unknowingly violated the UNC retaliation and MANY other
policies
In my mind, this is ALL related to APS
See press release below where you criticized them for not having a solicitation
license
And now, your own organization is GUILTY of the same!
If I am wrong, PLEASE provide proof of your license since 2006
See below were I PROVE your
exemption EXPIRED then
So you were NOT exempt from a license after 2006
I will ALSO be filing charges against the NC Secretary of State
I will let THEM deal with you
And guess what?
See the attache document
They will get ALL of the attached threats from you
Along with the original emails with the UNC IP addresses
In brief, I will be filing complaints with the following:
Thanks for using vile language and for your
threats
Let's see what I now do to share this with the
authorities
PLEASE keep scrolling ALL of the way down...for goodies
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 6:24:25 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Better not
antagonize her, Joe
Attachments: 2010-12-12_1803 PAWS NCSOS.png; 2010-12-12_1806 PAWS inc Reitman.png; PAWS
INC-ArticlesofIncorporation_230519038.pdf
One more BIG point...
I just researched PAWS
The nonprofit which Cramer cites Reitman as a board
member
And where Reitman, BELOW claims she doesn't even know
the organization
The same site he posted THIS on about me:
http://www.ourpaws.info/joe
Well, see below Articles of Incorporation on PAWS
Note that Cramer signed it
AND Reitman is listed as an office AGAINST her wishes
and knowledge!
I wish I were making this up
And what's worse is that Cramer is using the UNC
website to promote PAWS!
AND the slanderous site he created on me
Hence, CRAMER is making two innocent entities liable for HIS actions
UNC
Reitman
See below people
Seems to me, Cramer has some explaining to do
You see with a seven year statute of limitations...
ANY MONEY RAISED by PAWS without a license is ILLEGAL!!!
Why?
They had no exemption
They had no license
SAME OFFENSE as FOCAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And yet, Cramer proudly lists these ILLEGAL fund raising organizations on the
UNC website!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
See here: http://www.unc.edu/~cramer/
I will also be filing a complaint against PAWS and FOCAS with the NCSOS now
Thanks to his slanderous UNC derived website
Otherwise we may have a very big lawsuit
Who?
Me vs. you all
I'm serious
You have a choice
Associate yourselves with Cramer
And his illegal activities
Or be named in a lawsuit as a co-defendant
I have NO direct issues with Reitman or UNC
BUT you have to agree, your names are LITERALLY In black and white adjacent his
i.e., On Cramer documents, emails and websites
As such, unless they are removed and his websites and emails restricted
I will do what I need to do to protect my good name
See below
My evidence is bullet-proof
Is his?
If you doubt me, go ask the SOS if PAWS and FOCAS has
solicitation licenses?
If you doubt me, see Reitman DENYING association with
PAWS
And YET her name is listed by Cramer on the incorporation documents
AND the PAWS website AGAINST HER WISHES!!!
Below shows PAWS in incorporated
Below that PROVES no solicitation license
Below that see where Reitman is listed as an officer
Comedic actually
Sadly, this now causes Reitman and UNC to be liable
for Cramer's errs
See also full Article sof Inc. attached
Comments?
From:
Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 6:44:59 PM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: Better not
antagonize her, Joe
Attachments: 2010-12-12_1839 FOCAS renew!!.png; 2010-11-16_1145 FOCAS NCSOS.png
I DO apologize for the emails
See below
Straight from the NC Secretary of State
Doubt me?
See here:
http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/csl/Details.aspx?EventLogId=13421094
Now see below
What does it say/show?
It PROVES that Cramer ILLEGALLY SOLICITED MONEY FOR GERBER via FOCAS!
It PROVES IT!
Any questions?
Then see the actual termination status below that
So you see...
FOCAS has no solicitation license and yet collected funds illegally under a UNC
email
PAWS ALSO did NOT have a license!!
NCRR ALSO did NOT have a license until recently
Ha ha Professor
I'm going straight to the State on you now
Thanks for the slanderous website on me done on UNC's network
VERY nice
Read and weep
Read and weep
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 9:19:48 PM
To: Elliot M. Cramer; Strohm, Leslie Chambers;
Thorp, Holden
Subject: Re: Don't bother
copying me on your emails to Joe
Professor
Your continued harassment is NOT appreciated
I have provided VERY clear records from the NC Secretary of State
And yet, you STILL harass me
FOCAS was/ is NOT exempt in 2010!!!
Only in 2006!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(NC SOS PLEASE comment by responding to all and please clarify!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
You MUST apply to be exempt VERY YEAR
You didn't!
You allowed your exemption to EXPIRE!!!!!!!!!!
I just sent you the EXACT letter from the state which PROVED THIS!!!
And yet you still insist I am wrong!
I JUST spoke to Bonnie Norwood, the NC State listed contact for FOCAS
She AGREED WITH ME!!!
Your exemption status EXPIRED in 2006
She has stated she has received but has NOT completed the NEW NC SOS
paperwork!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AND she told me minutes ago YOU KNOW THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As she discussed with you!
Want to hear the tape?
The LEGAL TAPE??????????????????????????
AND yet you solicited monies from 2006 to 2010
I am copying the NC SOS on this
Your extortion and your harassment is NOT appreciated
Lets see what happens when we compare your 990's to
your Solicitation license!
Ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I will let the STATE do this
Then let's see who has the last laugh
Remember, I spoke to Bonnie Norwood, your FOCAS named board member
She ALSO says she has NOTHING to do with you!
This is NOW TWO board members from FOCAS who refuse to be associated with you
AND a THIRD board member (Reitman) from PAWS who ALSO
claims to have NOTHING to do with you
YET, ALL of your files state papers claim they are ACTIVE board members
Ha!
You have been caught in you lie!
I ask you and NCRR publicly:
Ha, what a fool
FOCAS, NCRR and PAWS all broke state laws
And you are pointing the finger to me
Hysterical
Answer the questions please...
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 9:47:51 PM
To: ncrottierescue@gmail.com; Scarlette
Gardner; Carolina Jarquin; JayJaharias;
Strohm, Leslie Chambers; Thorp, Holden; Elliot M.
Cramer
Subject: Re: Jackass joe
Attorney Gardner and Investigator Jacquin from NC
Secretary of State
Please see the comment below from Professor Cramer/FOCAS
Could you please email me back?
And confirm that FOCAS has NOT had a license since 2006
Obviously the good professor does not believe the State
Note his language
Also, I can assure the good professor with my 186 mensa
IQ
I do know how to read
Trust me, my 800 verbal SAT proves that
As does my perfect LSAT
I'm a three school ivy leaguer
I've had enough of his grief
Could you please clarify the situation:
I take offense to his comments
Thank you
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 9:54:44 PM
To: Elliot M. Cramer; NC Rottie
Subject: Re: Joe villarosa dog thief
This professor and UNC/FOCAS are OUT of control
I'm bcc'ing some of you on this
I want you to see how delusional this man is and how insane NCRR is...
I WISH I were making this up...
On 12/12/10 9:23 PM, ncrottierescue@gmail.com
wrote:
Yup he's pretty stupid. Ah the trash bin. Good idea for his emails. The NYSP is familiar
with him by name. They could tell us if he has a record. So far there are 7
people that are willing to do the attorney "thing". I am sure more
will crop up with joeys info all over the web. My site will be up in a few
days. I am waiting for everyones emails he sent to
them. I am going to make a separate page for every one like one for ncrr. One for FOCUS ect...I
am hope to receive the emails in a word document in order of his first email to
t his last. So far I have 8 separate pages. Its going to be EPIC. I am going to pay to have it
advertised so it will come up immediately when someone does a search on Jackass
opps I mean joe Villarosa. I am also going to ask for donations to help
fund the attorney cost just for the heck of it. The Get back Bella from the dog
thief Fund. He will love that! Oh and sell ( shirts and
stickers) that say joseph villarosa
is a dog thief with a pic of a jackass. We could have
a pic w hi ugly face behind bars. We could make
millions off this man.
I am a genius.
Please cosspost far and. WIDE.
D
rom: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 11:50:59 PM
To: crimetip@troopers.state.ny.us; Thorp, Holden; Strohm,
Leslie Chambers
Subject: Fwd: Don't bother
copying me on your emails to Joe
Attachments: Professor Elliot Cramer v1 to UNC.pdf; NCRR slander v1.pdf
Dear NY State Troopers (cc to UNC Legal and UNC Chancellor)
Please see the attached documents / emails
Note the threats and the language
THEN please see that the threats were carried out:
http://www.ourpaws.info/joe
Then please have someone from the Margaretville, NY barrack CALL (NOT visit) me
FYI, I have JUST spoken with the NC UNC police
Dispatcher "Vicky" -- who suggested I contact the NY State Police
UNC request I contact the NYS Troopers
http://www.dps.unc.edu/main/contactinformation.cfm
I obviously am doing so now
FYI, the UNC police suggested I submit a complaint against Professor Cramer AND
NCRR to them
This is it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please see the attached documentation which is VERY clear
I have been slandered
I have been mocked
I have been ridiculed
I have been threatened
My good name has been spread ALL over the internet by UNC's Professor Cramer
and NCRR
http://ncrottierescue.net/
See also this website created by UNC Professor Cramer and NCRR (above)
Please have a DETECTIVE, NOT a State Trooper, contact me
Then PLEASE have the NY State Trooper DETECTIVE (ONLY) contact the UNC police
AND me
Thank you
From: Joseph Villarosa [mailto:alphanalyst@catskill.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 1:38 PM
To: hostmaster@unc.edu; abuse@unc.edu; UNC Security
Subject: UNC SECURITY/ABUSE -- FORMAL 90 page complaint on Professor
Cramer
Dear UNC Hostmaster
Thanks for your time on the phone today
As you suggested, I am also copying the Abuse and Security divisions of IT
Please read the below scribd link VERY VERY carefully
Please download the document
See the MANY emails from Professor Cramer
Then kindly honor my requests to disable ANY and ALL access to UNC networks and
emails
He has obviously violated dozens of TOS and other University Guidelines
Everything you need should be provided
IF not, see 4shared.com link in scribd document to
SOURCE documents!
If you need ACTUAL emails, I will upload to a cloud
But I feel the attached should suffice as you could easily confirm my
documentation
By reviewing Cramer's emails to me through your network
KINDLY get back to me with a case # and a status
Due to severity of this issue and the potential legal consequences
I'm looking for IMMEDIATE resolution
NOT a prolonged investigation
I've already done the investigation
It's attached
Thank you
_______________________________________________________________________________
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:02:47 AM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Villarosa
v. UNC
Attachments: 2010-11-20_1339 cramer step down
2.png
Dear UNC
See below emails from Kook and Thorp
Then note today's dated...
Then count the number of days between the cited date for a reply and the
reality of the situation
Then look back at a dozen or more requests for your ASSISTANCE to
"police" Cramer
Then look at your measured response
Hint: There was none! NONE
Funny, I thought emails and phones work during vacation and over the holidays?
Silly me
THEN look at the slander, damage and legal liability against UNC he has created
on my person
www.ourpaws.info/joe
Then see the 90 page document HERE for EXACT and PRECISE details
AS WELL as the PRECISE UNC Guidelines that have been violated!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45450586/Elliot-Cramer-Complaint-v6?secret_password=2hdbafxebvytjnh9r67c
or
http://www.scribd.com/full/45450586?access_key=key-1piavej4onpqyzozcpw6
(Please advise if the links do NOT open)
If you think I'm going to go away, you are dead wrong!
I am beyond dismayed by how unprofessional your Legal and Administrative staff
have been at UNC
See the emails below
The "first week of January" has come and gone as has
"tomorrow" and still not a single email or phone denoting ANY
meaningful action
And YET Cramer is STILL slandering me on a daily basis, STILL using his UNC
emails and STILL has the website up her created on me!
NOTHING has been done.
Do you get it?
He is USING YOUR NAME to illegally raise money!
He is using YOUR EMAIL address to administer a slanderous website!
He is using YOUR good (??) name to raise money
for a nonprofit!
He is playing you all like a HARP and you are allowing him to do so!
He is also still ILLEGALLY soliciting money WITHOUT a MANDATED NC State
Solicitation License
NOR has he replied to TWO requests for compliance from the state for his
EXPIRED exemption status
I'm warning, yes warning you in clear language, I want written, DIRECT
and ACCEPTABLE ANSWERS within 24 hours or UNC will be sued
Trust me, your digital fingerprint is ALL over his handiwork
AND I have ALREADY "marketed" a "legal brief" of the
situation and identified a contingency-based law firm
So NO COST TO ME to pursue legal action
OR -- I may easily take the pro se/pro per route
And trust me, I'm a three school Ivy Leaguer...I know my way around in a court
room...even out of state and Federal court rooms
I ALSO know how to spin the media
And with ALL of the explicative and Harassment by Cramer coupled with his prior
notoriety --
Who do you think the press will believe?
24 hours, I'm done waiting and dealing with your incompetence, denial and
unprofessional
I trust I'm being clear?
See below
- joseph p. villarosa, MBA,
MPH
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
Subject:
|
Re: Villarosa v. UNC |
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:24:50 -0500 |
|
From:
|
Alphanalyst (Gmail) <alphanalyst@gmail.com> |
|
To:
|
Luger
I've "pulled the trigger" (made all docs PUBLIC and shared with press
AS PROMISED) on your "Colt 45 Gun Toting Nutty Professor"
Thanks for your profession and courteous reply (that would be sarcasm)
And thanks also for providing me the SAME consideration as my alleged attorney
i.e., You offered to call her and/or speak on the phone, but after months no
one called me from UNC!
I intend to use this against you in court as pro se defendants MUST be afforded
the SAME rights as an attorney
I set you up, you stepped into my trap
What a fool
I'm NOT letting this go counselor
You've got a big fight on your hands
And I NEVER, EVER lose...
Again, thanks for picking the phone up and calling me
Your name will now be in lights
As many lights as I can turn on
You've now missed NOT ONLY MY deadlines
BUT YOUR OWN
Enough is enough
- joseph villarosa
From: Joseph Villarosa (Alphanalyst)
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:32:22 PM
To: Luger, Laura B
CC: Strohm, Leslie Chambers; Thorp, Holden
Subject: Re: Villarosa v. UNC
Dear UNC
See below email from Luger
No one has gotten back to me and "shortly" has come and gone
As has the prior promise that someone would get back to me after the holidays
As has the OTHER promise that someone will get back to me after the new year
Yet another delay
See also that Cramer has escalated this matter by teaming with two other
parties
One of which has filed a no contact order against me!!!
See this website that Cramer created on me and is promoting by his UNC web
page!!!
http://www.ourpaws.info/joe
Read where it says UNC has "NOT been able to substantiate ANY of his
claims"
My documentation was VERY VERY clear as were the
policies that Cramer violated
I'm hoping someone picks the phone up and/or emails me EARLY next week
If you read my prior emails, I predicted this would spiral out of control and
it did!
I tried to work WITH UNC to PREVENT THIS!
I'm not pleased...
I feel UNC has NOT addressed this matter in a professional manner
NOR have you treated me fairly or communicated effectively
- joseph villarosa
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 8:40:25 PM
To: Thorp, Holden
Subject: Professor Elliot
Cramer
Attachments: G2 23.jpg
Attorney Luger
As I predicted, Cramer has continued to harass not only myself BUT OTHERS on
his UNC LINKED and PROMOTED website
I believe one or more individuals have since contacted UNC
Please click: http://www.unc.edu/~cramer/
Then you will see the DIRECT connection from his main UNC page to his
slanderous www.ourpaws.info website
It is now been SIX MONTHS since I first reported this matter to UNC
During this time, there's been NO effective action taken by the University
And NO results presented from your investigation
This is completely unacceptable
In fact, matters have escalated - as now - SEVERAL persons are mentioned
on his website
See this page for details and click the Court Order links and the "Another
nut-case" link at the bottom of the page
http://www.ourpaws.info/joe
It's been brought to my attention that Cramer has threatened a 75 year old
women!!
Please also see how he is mocking me via his UNC police and UNC Legal comments
These are a DIRECT RESULT of your PENDING presentation
i.e., If UNC took action SIX months ago, he obviously wouldn't be poking fun at
the situation
In my mind, Cramer is actually INTENTIONALLY provoking me and others
Why?
Then if he creates a legal liability for UNC, then you would be FORCED to
PROTECT him
I HONESTLY feel that is what is going on here
Your JANUARY email below cites there is an "ongoing campus review of the
situation, and expect the campus to communicate with your shortly"
Questions:
FYI --
Cramer ALSO created OTHER slanderous websites to harass me -- that were
UNRELATED to UNC
I've worked with Facebook, Scribd.com, Google.com and
4shared.com among others to remove slanderous comments from Cramer
I've spent dozens of hours (DAYS!!!) of my time doing such
I've cleared most of the issues through the appropriate legal channels
Meantime Cramer and company had MY Scribd.com and 4shared accounts deleted in retaliation!
(Hence, many of my below links do not work as Cramer removed the evidence!!)
This is beyond a waste of OUR time
I'm TRYING to put this behind me, but I cannot as he just refuses to go away or
remove his website
I'm trying to be respectful of UNC, but you've clearly dropped the ball
i.e.,
I've NOT contacted your board of governors again
I've NOT worked with the press
Why?
To PROTECT UNC
But I've had NO reciprocation at ALL!
Lastly, please note, I just lost TWO six figure engagements as a result of the
Cramer slander!!!!!!!
This is NOT hyperbole
The FACT that I first reported this issue in NOVEMBER of 2010 - SIX months ago
-- means if Cramer was policed by UNC, I may not have lost these engagements
So what was once an exercise in finder pointing, has now turned into a DIRECT
SIX FIGURE MONETARY LOSS
I would therefore like to finally garner UNC's help in removing Cramer's
website and disciplining him through your channels
This beats multiple lawsuits and the alternatives
I trust you agree
joseph villarosa
www.g2institute.com
_________________________________________________________________________________
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 11:52:39 PM
To: Cleveland, Joanna Carey
Subject: Fwd: Professor
Elliot Cramer
Attachments: Elliot Cramer Complaint v6.pdf
UNC Legal
Per my return receipt, Chancellor Thorp read my prior email yesterday but did
not reply
Nor did Luger or Strohm -- who may not have reviewed
it yet
Nor has anyone in a few MONTHS
Could SOMEONE please ask Attorney Strohm or
Attorney Luger to contact me?
See the attached for a summary on Professor Cramer
See also the below email thread
This is a serious LEGAL issue that has been pending for SIX months
I've been more than patient and I'd like to work with UNC to resolve the open
items
BUT -- I cannot do this in a vacuum; I need open dialog
Thank you
- joseph villarosa
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 8:52:11 PM
To: Waddell, Stan Adolphus
Subject: IT complaint
against UNC Professor Elliot Cramer
Attachments: Elliot Cramer Complaint v6.pdf
Mr. Waddell and Mr. Padilla
I located your names here: https://ccm.unc.edu/ITS/about_its/ITS_management/index.htm?ssSourceSiteId=
I'm hoping you could help since no other UNC department has been of much
service
FYI, this entire situation is directly related to the ITS department
How?
Breaches of MANY of your policies by Professor Elliot Cramer
Please see the attached document as well as the the
below email thread
It's long, but a quick read
In brief, Cramer has violated just about every IT / Security / Privacy and
related policy under the UNC sun
How?
Some is explained in the attached
Some I will explain on the phone if you like
Some others may include --
The attached lists other UNC
policies he's violated
I also have screenshots of MANY other violations derived from this page
http://www.unc.edu/campus/policies.html
MANY are DIRECTLY related to YOUR "Information Security" section
I know, I've downloaded each and reviewed
In fact, I've reviewed every single university policy and have a detailed list
with examples of ALL breaches
It's silly, how long my list is
But what is more comedic is that UNC legal has NOT even made a SINGLE call to
follow up in SIX MONTHS!!!
As such, I now feel it to be appropriate to go to your department as it ALL
centers around Cramer's questionable use of technology!!!
FYI, see below, I was told the University investigated him
But no one provided me ANY feedback
I'm GUESSING (bet'cha a nickle)
your department wasn't even involved in this investigation EVEN THOUGH it was
100% related to ITS!
I'm therefore hoping you will review the attached
Then CALL ME to discuss
THEN, perhaps you could speak to Legal and close the loop
I'm frustrated I'm being ignored by other UNC departments
I'm really hoping you will help
Why?
Because I'm trying to report a number of serious IT related LEGAL issues
And your legal folks JUST DON'T GET IT
I'm hoping the IT folks can educate the UNC lawyers!
As such, it places your university and your department in an unfortunate
situation should a lawsuit get filed
Why?
The evidence is clear as are your policies that have been breached
As well, it's abundantly clear UNC legal is covering this mess up -- possibly
at your expense
I'm TRYING to work WITH UNC
But I'm being slandered and harassed by one of your professors and I want it to
end
Kindly have someone call me tomorrow
Feel free to circulate my email to others in ITS
Kindly provide the professional courtesy of a phone call
Thanks
joseph villarosa
845-586-1604
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 6:28:13 PM
To: Waddell, Stan Adolphus
Subject: Re: IT complaint
against UNC Professor Elliot Cramer
Mr. Waddell and Mr. Padilla
I was hoping for a reply
I see Padilla reviewed my email several times and even forwarded it to UNC IP #
152.2.192.192
Great
Now I'd love some comments or to schedule a time to chat
I'd also like to speak to UNC legal on the same call if you could arrange
(They have NOT replied to my emails)
I'm sure you have skype, so perhaps we could vid-chat
Please advise
Thanks
- jospeh
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:11:15 PM
To: Thorp, Holden
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd:
Professor Elliot Cramer
Attachments: 2011-04-20_1842 Thorp.png
Chancellor Thorp
Thanks for reading my below email
(see below screenshot confirming same)
Sadly, no one from UNC replied to this or ANY other emails in FOUR months
Thus far, I've reached out to several departments, to no avail
(HR, ITS, Legal, UNC Police, etc.)
I even had my attorney contact Luger to inform her I'm pro se
And that UNC should deal directly with me on this matter
Oddly, after Luger invited my attorney to chat
AFTER she found out I was pro se, she REFUSED to speak to me
I just don't understand why I'm not being provided the courtesy of a reply
I'm trying to point out over two dozen UNC policy breaches by Cramer
One would think you would be appreciative of this as it may PREVENT more
serious actions by Cramer
By the way, I have been informed that Cramer
AGAIN threatened someone with a gun!!
Only this time, it was a 75 year old women!
See his website where he openly touts her: www.ourpaws.info
See Faith Walker link
Luckily he did NOT take action
BUT WHAT IF HE DID?
How would this look in the media if he did AFTER my MANY warnings that he was
dangerous?
How would this look after his prior incident where which
resulting in his resignation?
The man is obviously deranged and in my opinion COULD inflict bodily harm to
others
And yet, I've not been provided the investigation
results, ANY emails, or witnessed ANY changes in his actions or website
In fact, matters are worse
To be blunt -- I feel UNC is covering up the
Cramer scandal and leaving me hung out to dry!
It's been four months since UNC has contact me
During that time, he has ADDED names to his slanderous website
And he has harassed several others who are all upset by his actions
I know for a fact that a few have
already contacted attorneys for legal actions AGAINST UNC
Again, I predicted this could escalate to legal maneuvers and tried to work
with your office to prevent same
I believe one person recently took Cramer to court two days ago --
DIRECTLY related to the SAME situation I've presented
(I'm trying to get details and will share if you like)
Kindly have someone from your office or Legal contact me immediately
Some of my goals include:
Lastly, please note - I maintain documentation indicating I just lost TWO six
figure consulting projects due to Cramer!
He has DIRECTLY contacted dozens of people I know, including my Pastor and
business associates
He has also worked with others to send bulk emails out about me!!
As well, if one googles my name, there are scores of
slanderous Cramer links about me
I've had to consult THREE attorneys and have spent dozens of hours trying to
remove SOME of the links
Cramer's venom has now resulted in the quantifiable loss of over $200,000 in
income!!
The questions is -- what income did I lose thanks to Cramer - that I cannot
measure?
What "harm" did he slander cause?
I contacted your office SIX months ago to PREVENT EXACTLY THIS type of a
situation
So not only have I lost significant sums, but my
personal and professional reputation is now tarnished
And on TOP of this -- the worst of all is -- he threatened a 75 year old with a
gun!
Had anything happened to her and UNC could have been sued for countless
millions!
As it was ALL related to MY original situation and the lack of discipline by
UNC!
I hope you agree it's time UNC take serious actions against Cramer
BEFORE he slanders another
BEFORE he shoots someone (which I feel is in him)
BEFORE he creates MULTIPLE UNC lawsuits
He is a disgrace to your fine University and a threat to the safety of others
Kindly reply by the end of this business week or have Legal contact me by
Friday please
My thanks
joseph
www.g2institute.com
rom: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:19:55 PM
To: Thorp, Holden
Subject: Re: Professor
Elliot Cramer
Attachments: 2011-04-20_2112 faculty.png
Strohm
I'm insulted by your reply.
I fully understand your open
records policy ("public record") and the limits of FOIL/FOIA -- so
kindly advise on your precise UNC policy to request
same as I really don't want to dance back and forth for six MORE months.
And please, don't play the FEPRA or any or card, as I'm well aware of your
recent court LOSS. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/04/20/2235503/unc-loses-open-records-case.html
-- heck, I even know ALL about
this...http://www.statefansnation.com/index.php/archives/2010/12/17/93-email-from-unc-professor-to-thorp-makes-numerous-explosive-assertions/
OK, I've tried my best to work WITH UNC
It's obvious you take no responsibility for Cramer's actions EVEN THOUGH I have
the UNC digital fingerprint on his EVERY MOVE!
He is hiding behind you
And you are hiding behind a very lame excuse that will
be laughed out of court
Cramer has committed everything from illegal solicitations without a state
license to slander and even death threats to a 75 year old women!
ALL ON YOUR NETWORK!
I've had enough.
I will now do what I need to do.
- joseph villarosa
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 2:30:03 PM
To: Padilla, Ramon
Subject: IT complaint
against UNC Professor Elliot Cramer
Attachments: 2011-04-21_1436 padilla.png
Ramon
Thanks for again reading my email
This is the 11th "touch" between both emails I've sent
So there must be a genuine interest in what is going on
Why no reply?
I'm trying to help UNC
But I can't if I'm ignored...
Thanks
joseph
845-586-1604
___________________________________________________
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 11:54:46 PM
To: Stabile, Regina
Subject: Re: Professor
Elliot Cramer
Attachments: Cramer on FB.jpg; VillarosaFBIFOILv2.pdf
Dear Attorney Strohm
As a former Yale Alumni Club President, Harvard Fellow AND the President of ALL
Ivy League Schools (Ivy League Association) Alumni Organizations, I have utmost
respect for your position protecting the good name of UNC. But,
"enough is enough"! I've just searched Cramer's website to find
your two-faced dialog with him that totally contradicts your below email to me
AND contains his open mocking of you/UNC! Doubt me? Oh no, I never
lie -- see: http://www.ourpaws.info/joe
then see the Leslie Strohm
Link! Then see this link were he openly mocks YOU AND UNC! http://www.ourpaws.info/strohm.htm
-- FYI, this was precisely why I submitted a FOIL and NC Public Records
requests to UNC/Attorney Stabile (that is cc'd on
this email for professional courtesy). Why? To see how UNC is
spinning me. AND YOU ARE!!! NOW I HAVE PROOF that BOTH UNC AND
CRAMER have BOTH INTENTIONALLY LIED! Need I remind you, this is grounds
for a HUGE LAWSUIT COUNSELOR! All due to YOUR errs in handling this
situation! I'm NOT litigious and I highly respect UNC, but I'm also not
happy with your games or the games of Cramer. I've already interviewed
SEVERAL blue-chip law firms. Please don't force my hand. I'm TRYING
to work WITH UNC and you have given me now NO CHOICE!!! Some additional
comments:
In closing, I've the following STRONG suggestions:
As you've ignored MANY emails,
kindly reply to this one by Wednesday. See the below screenshots AND the
SEVERAL emails lifted from Cramer's website below, they are VERY
important. See also my attached FBI CLEAN FOIL.
joseph villarosa
_______________________________________________________________________________
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 6:25:45 PM
To: Stabile, Regina
Subject: Cramer has ADDED
PAGES about US to his website
Attachments: 2011-04-25_1716 Cramer new link.png; 2011-04-25_1720 new
link ourpaws.png
Attorney Strohm, Attorney Luger, Attorney Stabile and
Chancellor Thorp
Cramer is "at it" again...
Did you see that Cramer ADDED a link to his
official UNC website to OUR conversations?
i.e., WITHOUT my permission, he just made OUR conversations and yours/his
PUBLIC!
See this link for more
http://www.unc.edu/~cramer/
Then see the bottom of the web page
Do you know he also discussed US in a newspaper article????????????????????
Some comments:
I was hoping your help would
assuage the situation
Instead -- it was like poking a stick in the eye of a sleeping giant
Now Cramer is slandering us BOTH and calling us both "harassers" (see
his direct quote in article)
May I suggest consideration of the following action to protect OUR
"interests"
He's clearly violated about two
DOZEN UNC policies -- I can send you the FULL list if you wish
He's therefore legally lost his right to have a UNC web page
I've read your policies, this is clearly YOUR decision
It's time he be sent a message
Please consider legal action (court order to remove his ourpaws
SITE) and your dissolution of his UNC page and ALL content
It's WELL overdue
And it may also be the "olive branch" I need to discontinue my chats
with prospective law firms
As I have far better things to do than this -- as do you
Don't you have a University to run?
PLEASE provide the courtesy of a reply and detailed feedback
See below images and see ALL links
Thank you
From:
Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 12:38:45 AM
To: Stabile, Regina
Subject: Re: Professor
Elliot Cramer
Attachments: 2011-04-25_0025 cramer google 2.png; 2011-04-25_0023 cramer
google.png
Attorney Strohn (et al.)
I apologize for the follow-up email but I wanted to make one other IMPORTANT
point...
Please see this google link based upon my name
"Joseph Villarosa":
http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&tab=nw#sclient=psy&hl=en&site=webhp&source=hp&q=Joseph+Villarosa&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=bce1d2c2cef6738f
Note were a FEW of the Cramer "ourpaws"
website results show-up
And NOT just the MAIN page but pages that are NOT reference on the MAIN
page!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
See below screenshots
Note that it took me DOZENS of emails and DOZENS of hours to REMOVE the MANY
Cramer links to my name and his site
I had to contact Google
I had to contact Scribd.com
I had to contact MANY OTHER websites and groups
Now there are only a FEW derogatory links left
But only ONE is ENOUGH to slander my good name
As such, Cramer/UNC directly caused me to lose TWO six figure projects!
This is NOT my ONLY point...
NOW see THIS google search based on
"ourpaws.info strohm"
Eneter it yourself into google
if you doubt me!!!
http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&tab=nw#sclient=psy&hl=en&site=webhp&source=hp&q=Joseph+Villarosa&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=bce1d2c2cef6738f
And NOTE that YOUR NAME and Cramer's website are comingled /
co-referenced!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
See also below
My point?
So far UNC is lucky as THIS Page -- http://www.ourpaws.info/strohm.htm
-- is NOT picked up by the google search
"spiders"
BUT it is ONLY a matter of time before it is!!!!!!!!!!!
THEN ALL of your emails to Cramer will be posted ALL OVER THE INTERNET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i.e., This EXACT page and EVERYTHING ON IT WILL BE ALL OVER GOOGLE SEARCH
RESULTS!!! http://www.ourpaws.info/strohm.htm
Hence, perhaps NOW UNC is FINALLY getting a taste of
the Cramer "Medicine" he has been dishing out to me
How does it feel to have your name memorialized, ad infinitum counselor?
With NO WAY YOU can PERSONALLY get the website links removed?
Feels good doesn't it?
NOW YOU KNOW WHAT I'VE BEEN EXPERIENCING THANKS TO YOUR MANY
BLUNDERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ALL -- Ironically because you didn't listen to me SIX MONTHS AGO!!!!!!!!!
Allow me to be clear
EVEN IF CRAMER REMOVES THE ABOVE WEBSITE PAGE IT WILL STILL BE PRESENT IN
GOOGLE CACHE SEARCHES FOR YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Only HE can remove it by requesting same from Google
If he removes the LIVE PAGE, the saved or "cached" page will remain
for YEARS!
As such, NOW you can hopefully "taste" a dose of Cramer's
"medicine"
The "medicine" I've been TRYING to work with UNC to
PREVENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Get do you get it now counselor?
Now do you see why I've beggedUNC to work WITH ME for
SIX months?????????????????
Boy is UNC "obtuse" (DENSE!)
See below
I expect a formal written apology from UNC legal and the UNC chancellor
Or I will force this all to go viral on the net
This is NOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT a threat
It is a 1st amendment right!
- joseph villarosa
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 10:15:48 PM
To: Thorp, Holden
Subject: Cramer update to
Faith Walker (cc. UNC)
Faith Walker (cc UNC)
I'm sending you this email as apparently you've also had troubles with
Professor Cramer
I believe he recently threatened you and slandered you on his website
NOTE EMC: This is news to me; I’d like to see documentation ofthis
And you've since discussed same with UNC
FYI, I just spoke to the head of
the ATT/BellSouth Abuse department and they've already provided him a formal
abuse warning
As well I spoke to legal/management at Scribd.com and they DELETED his account
As did others!
In addition, Google legal has helped to block some of his slanderous links!!!
*** Note EMC This
is all news to me
This has taken an inordinate
amount of time and effort
And yet his www.ourpaws.info
site STILL lingers!!!
ATT told me one more peep out of him and his entire net and email access and
will be revoked
That said, I just checked ALL of his email addresses to see if ANYONE took any
measures against Cramer:
Oddly I got a positive validation on EVERY email meaning that all SEEM to be
working
FYI -- you could use one of these tools to check yourself
http://www.google.com/search?q=Elliot%20Cramer%20%2B%20Colt%2045&hl=en&ned=us&tab=nw#sclient=psy&hl=en&source=hp&q=how+to+check+email+address&aq=1&aqi=g5&aql=f&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=5a7627f4ddf7f63
This means UNC did NOT delete his ourpaws or FOCAS
email addresses
And he still has TWO Cramer email addresses at UNC
I'm copying our friends at UNC on this so they know
One would think the least they could do is to revoke his non-official email
addresses
After all, why can't he just set up a FOCAS and OURPAWS email address at gmail or another free site?
PERHAPS I'm wrong, but I checked my tests a FEW times
As well, please see a recent email thread below
VERY important
I'm sending it as I strongly feel that between the harassment WE received from
Cramer --
Coupled with his recent threat to you -- that UNC should FINALLY take action
to harshly sanction Cramer
As I'm unsure when last you spoke to UNC, this email is an attempt to keep us
all in active dialog
I believe Susan Boyd Fisher is ALSO upset with Cramer
But she is dealing with medical issues at the moment
I'm hoping she will ALSO contact UNC to let them know of HER harassment by the
good professor
BTW Faith, no one from UNC replied to the below or my last SEVERAL emails
I've since spoke to legal counsel about this situation and plan to escalate
matters if UNC continues to be uncooperative
FYI, I did a public record request for ALL emails from Cramer to UNC -- you may
also benefit from such a request
Or I could share my results with you if UNC every replies (I'm still waiting
for details)
By examining Cramer's emails with UNC - that he recently posted on web -- I
learned much
Namely that UNC is playing both ends against the middle and spinning ALL of us
to cover their rear
I've documented several UNC falsehoods that do NOT please me
So be careful dealing with them, as they are apparently playing high level
politics
As activists, nothing we can't handle
I think it's best WE ALL WORK TOGETHER ON THIS
But as I've said to UNC before - it's hard to negotiate when the other party
doesn't reply
I'm therefore hoping UNC will reply to my last few emails and Attorney Stabile
will contact me about my records request
Thank you Faith!
- joseph
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 9:38:58 AM
To: Strohm, Leslie Chambers
Subject: Re: acknowledgment
(Public Records Request dated 4/20/11)
Attorney Stabile
Thank you for your email
My address:
Joseph Villarosa
PO Box 66
Arkville, NY 12406
Regarding "in accordance with
the NC Public Records Act"
I know the law WELL
It's printed, highlighted and in front of me as we "speak"
This is how the applicable section reads:
§ 132‑6. Inspection and examination of records.
(a) Every custodian of public records shall permit any record in the custodian's custody to be inspected and examined at reasonable times and under reasonable supervision by any person, and shall, as promptly as possible, furnish copies thereof upon payment of any fees as may be prescribed by law. As used herein, "custodian" does not mean an agency that holds the public records of other agencies solely for purposes of storage or safekeeping or solely to provide data processing.
As such, there is NO definition of "promptly
as possible in accordance with the North Carolina Public Records Act"
As in the last "session" your politicians FAILED to agree to a
definition (as they did when drafting the actual law)
In this respect, your law is VERY vague and imprecise
Hence, you could (technically) intentionally make me wait several months or
more
And then hide behind the nebulous Act/Law and STILL be in compliance
Ugh
I get it, I get it
Please, provide updates in writing IF this
is going to take more than two weeks
As well, so that we FULLY understand each other and to conserve your
staff's time needed to "fix" inaccurate requests --
PLEASE provide me with the "specs"
(criteria) that you provided your techies
Why?
You HAVE to do this, so it's no extra work
And it will ensure I don't want 9 months only to get
the wrong material...
I'm NOT trying to be difficult, but I've had my fill of cat/mouse games
I know the law, I know all about the NCDCR
Heck, I even know the Records Management Analyst over UNC
(I spoke to these good people yesterday!!)
http://www.records.ncdcr.gov/guidelines.htm#laws
http://www.records.ncdcr.gov/about.htm
So please, kindly oblige my simple requests so we may expedite the processing
of these records
i.e., Kindly reply to the two questions above when you've a moment
MANY thanks for processing this
I DO appreciate your time
- jpv
________________________________________________________________________________
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:05:41 AM
To: Thorp, Holden
Subject: Terms of a
Compromise
Attachments: April 2009 187 copy 2_edited-1.jpg
Dear UNC
My apologies for ALL of the emails of late
Oddly, if someone called me, there would be LESS need for same (hint)
Believe it or not, I'm TRYING to work WITH UNC and avoid any/all legal action
Hence, this email
I BELIEVE I figured out the terms for a win-win situation
Please consider the below suggestions and FINALLY comment back
FYI, I've discussed this situation with SEVERAL attorneys/law firms
I REALLY do NOT want to take this route against UNC
(And I DO want to against Cramer personally, but I have better things to do
with my time)
I'm hoping if WE could come to an agreement NOW, such actions and the negative
press thereof may be averted
These are ONLY suggestions
I am by NO MEANS telling UNC what to do; there are merely MY suggestions
UNC to contact Cramer's hosting company (godaddy.com)
Please see the below email
Godaddy is the hosting company for ourpaws.info
As you know, it was DIRECTLY linked to UNC for MANY years!
Click this link to go back in time (I'm NOT kidding) to 2004
http://replay.web.archive.org/20040729002642/http://www.ourpaws.info/
Or type in his URL here and pick ANY date in time
http://web.archive.org/
There you will see YOUR UNC co-branded email address labeled on his site!
Hence, I have UNC's digital fingerprint tied to Cramer slanderous website BACK
TO 2004!!!!!!!!!!
As well, please understand that Cramer used UNC email accounts to access this
website
And to manage it
And to CREATE pages!
I've already documented this and have OTHER PROOF that I will NOT share unless
this goes to court
Trust me, Cramer's ourpaws.info is DIRECTLY Tied to UNC in MANY MANY WAYS
It's therefore CLEAR that even though the CURRENT UNC links and references have
been removed --
The "damage" has already been done (back to 2004 -- I JUST PROVED
IT!!!)
A compromise for ALL could be this...
Read the below email
And contact godaddy and ask Godaddy
to remove the pages in question
Google my name FIRST to see the SEVERAL other Cramer pages on me as all are NOT
on the "Joe" page
You could ALSO ask godaddy to remove the NEW LINKS to
UNC/Strohm!!!
If the request comes from "legal" - it MAY very well work
Easy
This would make me VERY happy
AND it would ALSO dissociate UNC officially with Cramer and his actions!
IF it does NOT work, you MAY need a court order to get it removed
BUT you can discuss this with godaddy if need be
My point?
Instead of ASKING Cramer to diffuse his venom, just have it legally removed
PLEASE consider this option as it is the fastest way to offer me an olive
branch
AND to clear YOUR good name from his website as well (private emails with UNC)
My BIGGEST complaint is that Cramer has adhered to your request to remove links
BUT THEN BOLSTERED the ourpaws page in a deliberate
act of passive aggressive retaliation
This is CLEAR
It's THIS PAGE (ourpaws.info/joe) that I find MOST
offensive
Remove it and the other pages related to me and this would be very helpful
UNC to contact Cramer and ask for HIM to contact Google
It's clear Cramer is an embarrassment to the University and UNC HAS LEGAL
GROUNDS against him!
PERHAPS - you could contact him and ask him to remove ALL google
search results links to my person, UNC, Walker, etc. through google?
i.e., A Quasi-cease and desist with a built in request to remove the above as a
"gesture of good will"
Here is the EXACT site he will need to use:
http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=164734&from=136868&rd=1
My point is that if godaddy removes the pages -- they
will STILL remain in google search results for YEARS
(Typically) ONLY CRAMER can get these removed
You MAY be able to get some removed (I did) but it would take numerous attempts
and many hours of time
I feel you could request this of Cramer in exchange for NOT taking ANY or LESS
disciplinary action?
A swap
Fair, legal, equitable
Cease and Desist
Next if UNC could draft a C&D to Cramer naming ALL of the persons he's
slandered (Castillo, Villarosa, Walker, Fisher) --
And request he does NOT post ANY future reference to our names (at LEAST MINE
as I can't speak for the others)
As well, that he does NOT post ANY reference to UNC's "name" in
future web posts
Then I would find this suitable and this MAY potential be what I need to NOT
take legal action
This would obviously create a win (Villarosa) - win
(Cramer) - win (UNC)
I do NOT want to contact him as the man is belligerent
And to be blunt, I am fearful of physical retaliation from him
I'm NOT KIDDING
I feel the C&D from UNC (cc'd to me- et al) would
be a VERY good idea
"Hand Slapping"
Instead of ME suing Cramer or UNC doing a full blown investigation
Why not just delete ALL of his UNC email addresses (he has 4-5)?
As well, I would SERIOUSLY consider deleting his "Cramer" UNC page
Why?
He needs to be disciplined and taught a lesson
And these actions directly fall under the powers per your guidelines
These suggestions could be done in literally MINUTES
And would send a STRONG message to Cramer when coupled with the C&D
Again, this is a FAR better option that a lawsuit
AND additional BAD press
Summary
The monetary cost of defending a lawsuit is obviously inordinate
BUT the "opportunity costs" are MUCH higher!!
i.e., Clogging up your legal team for this when they SHOULD be working on pure
university affairs
Hence, the above "compromise" / suggestions seem to make sense for ALL
parties
Kindly consider my thoughts and email back your reply
Or
Feel free to ring me
Please do not misconstrue my email
I'm a strategy analyst and I think WAY out of the box
Sometimes, the easiest and most unorthodox solutions are the best
Case in point
Thank you - joseph
(PS: The below Scridb.com link doesn't work)
-------- Original Message --------
|
Subject:
|
RE: Compliance Complaint against FOCAS/Elliot Cramer by Joseph Villarosa |
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:54:40 -0700 |
|
From:
|
GoDaddy Abuse Department <abuse@godaddy.com> |
|
To:
|
Joseph Villarosa (Alphanalyst) <alphanalyst@catskill.net> |
Dear Joseph,
Thank you for contacting Go Daddy's Spam and Abuse Department.
GoDaddy.com
does not allow illegal content on our customer's websites. However, as a
hosting provider, it is not our place to determine if the site you have
mentioned is actually engaging in illegal activities.
From:
Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:04:37 PM
To: Thorp, Holden
Subject: Re: Cramer update
to Faith Walker (cc. UNC)
Hi Faith
Sorry but I didn't share ANY ATT info with UNC
Hence, I did NOT share info on your to UNC, you are mistaken
I did however contact ATT to ensure OUR complaints made it to the manager WHO
ASKED FOR THEM
Please re-read what I sent
i.e., I ONLY provided ONLY to ATT what YOU had ALREADY provided them
Hence, there was NO NEW information provided
I don't see this as a problem, especially since ATT asked to see your complaint
SO they would link it to mine
Also, you said everyone was helpful, thanks great
But sadly your name is still plastered all over Cramer's site
As is mine
Note your personal email address is now available via google
searches thanks to Cramer
Click this to see it in living color
http://www.ourpaws.info/Faith%20Walker.htm
Our common goal should be to remove this website/page and ALL references to us
Hopefully UNC will consider some of my suggestions in my earlier email
Thanks
- joseph
From:
Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:26:32 PM
To: Thorp, Holden
Subject: Re: Terms of a
Compromise
Attachments: 2011-04-28_2259 Ourpaws
Strohm.png; 2011-04-28_2230 cramer taken down.png
UNC
I'm bothered that I've not been provided the professional courtesy of a reply
to my last several emails
And YET, I keep noting changes to various Cramer related websites and links
I feel it would be better if you communicated any advances with me directly -
don't you think?
Versus spending time manually comparing various web pages
For example, you obviously JUST removed his official UNC (Professor) page as
evidenced by the below error message
This is GREAT, thank you!
Sadly, as I predicted -- it's too late as now YOUR (our!) NAMES (and PERSONAL
emails) are ALL over GOOGLE!
And NOT in a positive light
See below
i.e., Cramer's Professor page is now OFF UNC's website
BUT the "breadcrumbs" to me (and you!) are still in google cache memory
AND WILL BE for YEARS
As well, the ourpaws.info/joe site he created VIA a
UNC email address access to godaddy -- is STILL there
As are the links to several others
I checked his UNC email addresses today and they SEEM to ALL be working
(I MAY be wrong)
Truly, I don't understand why ALL UNC email addresses were not deleted six
months ago when I first asked!
Had UNC listened to me MONTHS ago, MUCH of these problems would have been
averted
It SEEMS the only thing action taken was you disassociated UNC with Cramer by
deleting his professor page
Bravo!!
But there's still much more that should be done
If you correct a problem ex post facto, and it's
already created collateral damage...
Then unless ALL remnants of the original problem are addressed
The issues STILL EXIST
So removing his page does NOT fix the OTHER problems that originally stemmed
from his UNC digital fingerprint
FYI, I have ALL of his sites and yours -- digitally recorded (video)
I have captured ALL changes on a daily basis
From my videos I can extract screenshots of frames
And I have
So I can "measure" the delta between my requests -- and your actions
I thank you for what you've done
But I feel the suggestions I made recently should ALL be executed
I'm again requesting someone contact me on the phone
See TWO screenshots below
Progress!
My best – joseph
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:57:32 PM
To: Thorp, Holden
Subject: Request for
Conference Call with UNC
Ms. Brill
I hope you are well
I need your help please...
We had a long chat several months ago about Professor Cramer
I explained the entire situation and you indicated you would help
Specifically, you promised someone would call me BEFORE you left on vacation
NO ONE EVER DID
Nor did you EVER follow-up - AS PROMISED
Then I left messages and many emails - requesting a phone call from Luger
I was told she would contact me "during the first week of January
2011"
In fact -- SHE ALSO informed me SHE would contact me "in early
January"
See verification of this below
SHE NEVER CALLED ME -- even after TWO promises to do so
This is unprofessional and also directly positioned UNC in a very precarious
situation
The matter has escalated -- AS I PREDICTED - thanks to UNC's hand's-off posture
This is a FORMAL REQUEST for YOU to arrange a conference call with:
** Luger
** Strohm
** Myself
I'm hoping we could chat NEXT week as I'm now in receipt of a strongly
worded letter from Ms. Faith Walker to Cramer/UNC
Apparently Cramer (AS I PREDICTED!!) threatened someone / HER -- with a GUN!
YET ANOTHER THREAT BY CRAMER!!!
Wasn't ONE enough?
How many does it take before UNC step's-in?
Does he need to actually commit a crime before UNC realizes the legitimacy
of his threats?
I find it curious that UNC legal had con-calls with Walker and my multiple
requests have been ignored
EVEN THOUGH I reported the incident MONTHS before Walker!!!
I'm copying the UNC Police on this matter as I've previously contacted them
requesting their assistance
ALSO to no avail
(Hint -- THEY ALSO screwed up, as did legal, as did administration, as did ITS,
as did HR...)
(Office McNeil -- please forward to Ferguson or whomever the correct authority
is)
May I HIGHLY suggest your office circle back with the UNC police to discuss
this situation before Cramer actually TAKES actions
The LAST thing UNC needs is more negative Cramer press
Could you imagine if the FACT that I warned UNC about this SIX MONTHS ago --
LEAKS out to the press??????????????
I will politely leave this request in your court
As you are the admin for Attorney Luger, I'm hoping you will accommodate my
request
Kindly reply REGARDLESS
My next step will be legal - if I'm again
ignored
(Please see entire thread below)
My very best,
- joseph villarosa
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:42:40 AM
To: Thorp, Holden
Subject: Re: Request for
Conference Call with UNC
Attachments: 2011-05-02_0947 UNC public safety.png
Ms. Brill
I was hoping for the courtesy of a reply to my below email
I see that Thorp and Public Safety both read and forwarded the below email,
cumulatively a dozen or so times
See below for some details
I'm therefore assuming since my records indicate you all received my email,
that you've discussed my request
Kindly provide a proposed date and time for a conference call
This will be my last request
Thank you
joseph villarosa
845-586-1604
From: Joseph Villarosa (Alphanalyst)
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 7:18:47 PM
To: Stabile, Regina
Subject: Re: Villarosa & UNC: Request for Meeting + Records Request
(round 2)
Thanks
I was able to get some weird text files to open from the CD, but they are hard
to read
And then I noticed that some of the To/From names were removed
Why is that?
As well, please see my prior email
MANY emails are apparently not on the CD
If you look at Cramer's website, there are tons of UNC emails between him and
the university
See links below
I believe the search criteria used may have been too restrictive or inaccurate
Could someone compare it to my request?
I'm confident there are more than 30 emails between Cramer and UNC/Legal/Admin
in several months
So PLEASE, before you send 30 emails in the correct eml
format, could someone review the situation?
Something is wrong and I don't need another CD if it's the right format, but
still incomplete
I hope you understand
See links below for Cramer emails
The emails on Cramer's slander website should be the litmus test for what I
need
If ANY emails are there (Cramer/UNC) then I should get it and then some...
Then something is "off"
Could you comment on some of the redactions?
Are they legally permissible?
I DO appreciate your time, but I also would like to get all of the requested
emails
Thanks
From: Joseph Villarosa
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 10:57:50 AM
To: Stabile, Regina
Subject: (outlookEMLandMSGconverter Trial
Version Import) Villarosa & UNC: Request for
Meeting + Records Request (round 2)
Attorney Thompson (bcc)
Per our phone conversation last night, it's time to take action against Cramer
and UNC
Could you please send Cramer a formal C&D
and a request to retract all information on his ourpaws.info website?
As we discussed, I will initiate legal action (no contact order, charges, police reports) on this end soon
As well, could you please send a FORMAL request for a conference call
between us and UNC??????
See below for details
I'm way tired of Cramer's slander and UNC's delays
(UNC AGAIN avoided replying to my last FEW formal written requests for a
con-call)
I've waited for SIX MONTHS and as I predicted the matter has only worsened
Now, THANKS TO UNC, he is slamming BOTH of us!!!
See ALL links here and then links in links
http://www.ourpaws.info/joe
Thank you!!!!!!!!!
- joseph
Attorney Stabile (Luger, Strohm,
Thorp)
I received your CD recently
A few problems:
Please see my below email where I CLEARLY state:
"...It's the year 2011, I specifically request *.eml format (I do NOT want unformatted TEXT) that includes actual IMAGES of all photos and scans AND I ALSO need ALL attachments (not just the NAME of the attached file). Please either upload the emails a la carte to a web "cloud" (www.4shared.com or OTHER file sharing site) OR to CD or DVD via USPS. Again, I do NOT want hard copy..."
I could NOT have been more exact
in both asking for .eml format
In reality, you sent a CD with 30 files that cannot be read (msg format) because you did not adhere to ANY of my above
requests
Please send me what I requested -- all emails in an *.eml format as I'm on a
Mac (on Thunderbird email client)
And you sent me a Windows Exchange compatible format (20% of the world is OFF
Windows now)
Note as well - that I'm a techie and I've spent now FOUR HOURS trying to
import, convert and read these emails to NO avail
My per diem is no different than a "good attorney" hence I have no
time or patience to squander converting files
I've given it the college try; now please send what I requested
You may also avoid a CD entirely and upload to a private file share site as I
requested below
In theory your techs should be able to EASILY save these files to *.eml or
compatible another Mac Thunderbird email client format
Then upload to a cloud
This should take no more than a few minutes as you've already identified the
files
(Though as detailed below, I feel you missed MANY)
Note as well that *.msg formats are NOT "standard" - they are one of
dozens of email formats, hence I'm perplexed as to why you provided same
Against my written wishes and with no notice that UNC would take it upon
yourselves to provide YOUR format
I noticed that Cramer has RECENTLY posted MY APRIL emails to UNC on his website
In my mind, this implies you were able to CORRECTLY fulfill his NC Public Record law request, yet NOT
mind...
CURIOUS...VERY CURIOUS...
As well, this email is being sent to Luger, Strohm
and Thorp who have AGAIN not replied to my MANY requests to meet
Below is my UNANSWERED EMAIL to Brill (Admin Asst.)
I have return receipts that THIS EXACT EMAIL was opened, shared and read MANY
times!!!
Hence, I was AGAIN, INTENTIONALLY IGNORED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As I predicted Cramer -- has CONTINUED his slash and burn campaign
See this:
http://www.ourpaws.info/joe-april%2017.htm
See "And end to fruitcake..."
See "The Nuts's correspondence"
See "Correspondence with Leslie Strohm"...
All found here: http://www.ourpaws.info/joe
THEN see this page from Cramer where he BLASTS UNC and yours truly
http://www.ourpaws.info/strohm.htm
I'm sending this because there are MANY MANY emails
here between Cramer and UNC
And the CD I was provided had only 30 emails
As an example. there are about TWENTY EMAILS on JUST
this Cramer page
http://www.ourpaws.info/strohm%20letters.htm
And yet you claim there are only 30 in TOTAL over the six month period of time?
No way, something is wrong on your end -- you did NOT provide ALL of the emails
I requested
Humor me and have someone reconcile the CD contents to ALL of Cramer's posts
You will then see my logic is never wrong
I want EVERY EMAIL from/to Cramer as allowed by LAW -- I'm guessing you missed MANY
(I'm believe you missed DOZENS)
But I cannot reconcile as you sent the wrong format
My point?
UNC naively thought that by disassociating Cramer by removing the UNC links to
his Ourpaws.info page you would be legally protected
You were sorely mistaken for the dozens of reasons I've provided in the past
Instead -- you only inflamed the situation and now he is retaliating AGAINST
BOTH OF US as evidenced by the above and below link
AND by this Herald Son article on US by Cramer
http://heraldsun.com/view/full_story/12884754/article-UNC-general-counsel-has-too-much-time-to-spare?instance=main_article
After clicking the link in the article - you are taken DIRECTLY to the
FALSIFIED THREATS (by me) against Susan Barrett
As well as other PRIVATE emails
Cramer has INTENTIONALLY created this page then INTENTIONALLY driven traffic to
this page
As such, HE has CLEARLY breach NC Cyberstalking laws
on numerous occasions
And yet, UNC has done nothing to effectively police his spew
You will now hear from Attorney Thompson who is NOT retained AT THIS POINT
As such, I AM STILL PRO SE and she is merely facilitating communication due to
your resistance
- joseph
__________________________________________________________________
From:
Joseph Villarosa (Alphanalyst)
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 12:49:17 PM
To: Stabile, Regina
Subject: Re: Villarosa & UNC: Request for Meeting + Records Request
(round 2)
Attorney Stabile
Please see the below screenshot taken RIGHT from an email you provided
Note, no "To" field or email address
I did NOT edit this, this is how you provided
Hence, there are clear redactions in the material you provided
Please check this email on your end
It COULD be the program I used to open it
BUT I do NOT think so as I have many other emails with the "To" field
complete
I'm writing because I'd like ALL emails requested; not just 30
And I'd like complete emails
Please check your CD before you sent it against the Cramer website
There you will find scores of emails between himself and UNC
If it's on his website, then I should get it/them as these were UNC related
emails
Again, I'm looking for ALL such emails, not just those on his website
There shouldn't be MORE on his website than what you provide
There are clearly more than 30 emails
Thanks
joseph
From:
Joseph Villarosa (Alphanalyst)
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 9:46:42 AM
To: Stabile, Regina
Subject: Re: Villarosa & UNC: Request for Meeting + Records Request
(round 2)
FYI
Regarding your comment about redactions
Here's what the laws indicates is exempt (below)
After reviewing this list, I can't image the emails I'm requesting to include
ANY of the below
Therefore, I'm not sure what type of information you would need to redact
Please ensure any redacted information adheres to the following statutes
You are not entitled to redact sections of the emails that may
present legal liability to UNC
I know the law
This is my assumption of what you meant when you cited redactions
Please, no "doctored" documents
As an example - why does the below email NOT have a "To" field?
As this was a single email you provided, I'm
assuming this is how it arrived
Was this field redacted?
If so, you are NOT allowed to do so per the law
Please advise
joseph