Confidential MAIL - do NOT circulate

LEGAL Disclaimer

Per NC Law - if an email is labeled confidential - it is NOT part of the Public Records laws Therefore do NOT EVER PROVIDE THIS EMAIL TO ANY THIRD PARTY as you do NOT have my permission

UNC

I've waited since 5/18 for a reply to my below emails I feel this excessive

I'm therefore writing to address this NC Pub Rec Law delay and OTHER issues Because the issues overlap, I had to send ONE email to all parties Attorney Stabile asked me NOT to commingle such emails, but I had no choice Allow me to make some important / Misc. points please:

• Cramer is clearly violating your retaliation policy by provoking US due to your removal of his UNC web page and email address!

o See UNC related MANY posts here: http://www.ourpaws.info/ioe

o May I suggest you review this policy AND all UNC breaches as detailed in my 93 page document

heretofore provided

• Cramer is spinning you, lying and clearly implying he has been cleared and I'm wrong

o See: An end to the fruitcake Joe's dealings with UNC (and "end"??? This is NOT over by a long-shot) o See: http://www.ourpaws.info/ioe-april%2017.htm

o Oddly, he's using the April 20 Strohm email to me stating UNC has NO responsibility over Cramer's actions - which was then completely countered by a later UNC email to Cramer stating he WAS under UNC law and as such had his email address and web page removed!

o My point? He's gaming us ALL and using his website to slander US for his own personal gains

o I predicted six months ago this would snowball; now do you see what I was trying to prevent?

o I was TRYING to prevent UNC from being slandered, it's NOW TOO LATE!

o I was TRYING to protect you by asking you to protect me!

• Cramer was provided a formal cease and desist from Attorney Thompson in January ~ he's obviously breached this as evidenced by his website

• Cramer is intentionally smearing UNC's good name

o This was all planned, methodical and done with malice - just as he has against me! o http://www.ourpaws.info/strohm.htm

• UNC erred by providing Cramer with certain emails that were NOT provided to me per my NC Public Record Law request!

o See below email to Stabile for details!!

o I've lined up all of the emails UNC obviously provided Cramer against the 29 provided me, they do NOT line up!

o UNC withheld documentation to me ~ AGAINST the law ~ and provided Cramer with the Full Monty! o How do I know? It's on his ourpaws website!

o Please have your legal staff review ALL of the documentation/emails on Cramer's website and you will

see there is much more there

o Kindly have someone encourage Stabile to review my original request and compare it to what was provided Cramer

o My specific complaints are as follows please see original request WAY BELOW

■ Certain email information was redacted - illegally - OUT of compliance with NC Record law

■ NOT all emails were provided

■ MANY internal threads were NOT provided

■ MANY emails between Cramer and UNC legal were NOT provided

• I've STILL not had a reply to my request for a meeting about this matter

o It's time!

• UNC INCORRECTLY stated to Cramer that he violated the Personal Use policy - WRONG!

o He violated a few dozen policies as I've detailed before! o Look to your IT policies for MANY!!!

o My point is you are playing ONE card against him, you should play MANY!

o See my 93 page document for other breached policies

o Hint: Pull out ALL UNC policies (I HAVE!!) and compare against what he's done

• I see Cramer has now gone to Ross to get his account reinstated

o I have NOT contacted Ross, and at this point will NOT out of respect to UNC

o BUT - May I HIGHLY suggest you send Ross my 93 document as it contains MANY emails from Cramer

with his UNC address o Cramer is painting a picture that I'm some nut and he's lily white - false!

o My document PROVES Cramer "laundered" money through his UNC email addresses via illegal chipins o Ross needs to know this

o Cramer did NOT, I repeat, did NOT have a MANDATED NC Charitable Solicitation License for FOUR YEARS!!!

o The entire time, he collected money via your email address and then played coy and later told you he

wasn't aware of this -- poppycock! o May I also HIGHLY suggest you send Ross the ourpaws.info/joe page with scores of ANTI-UNC posts by

Cramer

•

• Removal of www.ourpaws.info/Joe website that slanders UNC and Villarosa

o May I again suggest UNC ask Cramer to remove this entire page!

o If he does not listen a court order will work via his hosting company - godaddy.com

o He's ignored all of my prior requests to remove this page and he's also ignored a FEWC&Dsl! o As UNC is ALSO being slandered (see this Herald Sun article slamming UNC!) ~ perhaps we should compare notes?

o http://heraldsun.com/view/fuH storv/12884754/article-UNC-general-counsel-has-too-much-time-to-spare?instance=main article

In sum, I maintain, UNC CREATED this unfortunate situation by ignoring my requests to immediately sanction Cramer as I suggested

As a result of NOT doing so, you empowered him

He originally created his Ourpaws.info/joe website to retaliate against me

But is NOW using it to retaliate against UNC!

So oddly, he has, through his own ignorance (and NC Pub Rec law email posts) ~ aligned us ~ As we've both a common goal ~ remove his website and legally sanction/silence him

Since NOVEMBER of 2010 I've been TRYING to work WITH UNC

Now that we have a "common problem" - one would think a phone call would be in order... After all - I was PROMISED one SIX MONTHS AGO by legal, then shunned It's time to figure this out and work together Joseph

845.586.1604

On 5/29/11 11:32 PM, Joseph Villarosa (Alphanalyst) wrote: Attorney Stabile:

You never replied to my below email Please do

As well, please see the Cramer website: http://www.ourpaws.info/Why?

Because he has MANY MANY UNC emails that you did NOT send me Apparently you fully complied to his NC Public Records Law request Though sadly, not mine Curious

I will be providing more detail soon

VERY DETAILED info that is, VERY

I explicitly asked you NOT to just send the same 30 emails but in a different format You did exactly as I asked you NOT to do See below

You also sent redacted information

AND you also sent emails that had NOT originated from UNC

Please review what you provided

Humor me and review ALL of his links

Then compare all of his email to the 30 you provided me

Something is seriously wrong here

You will find that what you provided me was NOT the "universe" It's apparent UNC has "held back" material Bad form

(Illegal I may add as well) See also items below

Seems to me, you don't need any additional bad press... Joseph villarosa

On 5/19/11 9:46 AM, Joseph Villarosa (Alphanalyst) wrote: FYI

Regarding your comment about redactions Here's what the laws indicates is exempt (below)

After reviewing this list, I can't image the emails I'm requesting to include ANY of the below Therefore, I'm not sure what type of information you would need to redact Please ensure any redacted information adheres to the following statutes

You are NOt entitled to redact sections of the emails that may present legal liability to UNC

I know the law

This is my assumption of what you meant when you cited redactions Please, no "doctored" documents

As an example - why does the below email NOT have a "To".field?

As this was a single email you provided, I'm assuming this is how it arrived

Was this field redacted?

If so, you are NOT allowed to do so per the law

Please advise

Joseph

• Communications between attorneys and government clients made within the scope of the attorney-client relationship N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.1

• State and local tax information N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.1

• Public Enterprise Billing Information N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.1

• Personally Identifiable Admissions Information for North Carolina public colleges and universities N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.1

• Trade secrets N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.2

• Certain government lawsuit settlements N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.3

• Criminal investigation records N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.4

• Criminal intelligence information records N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.4

• Information contained in a 911 database N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.5

• Emergency Response Plans N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.6

• Photographs and recordings of autopsies (although the text of an official autopsy report is a public record which you may request) N.C. Gen. Stat. § 132-1.8

On 5/18/1112:49 PM, Joseph Villarosa (Alphanalyst) wrote: Attorney Stabile

Please see the below screenshot taken RIGHT from an email you provided

Note, no "To" field or email address

I did NOT edit this, this is how you provided

Hence, there are clear redactions in the material you provided

Please check this email on your end

It COULD be the program I used to open it

BUT I do NOT think so as I have many other emails with the "To" field complete I'm writing because I'd like ALL emails requested; not just 30 And I'd like complete emails

Please check your CD before you sent it against the Cramer website

There you will find scores of emails between himself and UNC

If it's on his website, then I should get it/them as these were UNC related emails

Again, I'm looking for ALL such emails, not just those on his website

There shouldn't be MORE on his website than what you provide

There are clearly more than 30 emails

Thanks

Joseph

On 5/18/11 8:21 AM, Stabile, Regina wrote: Dear Mr. Villarosa -

We included all messages responsive to your request. We did not make any redactions to the documentation. After you receive and are able to open the documentation in the .emi format, if you have any specific questions please let me know.

Sincerely, Regina

Regina J. Stabile, J.D.

Director, Institutional Records and Reporting Compliance

Office of University Counsel

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

110 Bynum Hall, Campus Box 9105

222 East Cameron Avenue

Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-9105

http:/Mww.unc.edu/depts/leaal/

Direct Line: 919-843-1830

Main Office Line: 919-962-1219

Facsimile: 919-843-1617

Electronic Mail: regina stabile0Ounc.edu

From: Joseph Villarosa (Alphanalyst) rmailto:alphanalyst(5)catskill.net

(5)catskill.net

] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 7:19 PM To: Stabile, Regina

Subject: Re: Villarosa & UNC: Request for Meeting + Records Request (round 2) Thanks

I was able to get some weird text files to open from the CD, but they are hard to read And then I noticed that some of the To/From names were removed Why is that?

As well, please see my prior email